DORA

Preamble (Recitals 1 – 106)

Recitals

Chapter I (Articles 1 – 4)

General provisions

Article 1

Subject matter

Article 2

Scope

Article 3

Definitions

Article 4

Proportionality principle

Chapter II (Articles 5 – 16)

ICT risk management

Section I

Article 5

Governance and organisation

Section II

Article 6

ICT risk management framework

Article 7

ICT systems, protocols and tools

Article 8

Identification

Article 9

Protection and prevention

Article 10

Detection

Article 11

Response and recovery

Article 12

Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery procedures and methods

Article 13

Learning and evolving

Article 14

Communication

Article 15

Further harmonisation of ICT risk management tools, methods, processes and policies

Article 16

Simplified ICT risk management framework

Chapter III (Articles 17 – 23)

ICT-related incident management, classification and reporting

Article 17

ICT-related incident management process

Article 18

Classification of ICT-related incidents and cyber threats

Article 19

Reporting of major ICT-related incidents and voluntary notification of significant cyber threats

Article 20

Harmonisation of reporting content and templates

Article 21

Centralisation of reporting of major ICT-related incidents

Article 22

Supervisory feedback

Article 23

Operational or security payment-related incidents concerning credit institutions, payment institutions, account information service providers, and electronic money institutions

Chapter IV (Articles 24 – 27)

Digital operational resilience testing

Article 24

General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing

Article 25

Testing of ICT tools and systems

Article 26

Advanced testing of ICT tools, systems and processes based on TLPT

Article 27

Requirements for testers for the carrying out of TLPT

Chapter V (Articles 28 – 44)

Managing of ICT third-party risk

Section I

Key principles for a sound management of ICT third-party risk

Article 28

General principles

Article 29

Preliminary assessment of ICT concentration risk at entity level

Article 30

Key contractual provisions

Section II

Oversight framework of critical ICT third-party service providers

Article 31

Designation of critical ICT third-party service providers

Article 32

Structure of the Oversight Framework

Article 33

Tasks of the Lead Overseer

Article 34

Operational coordination between Lead Overseers

Article 35

Powers of the Lead Overseer

Article 36

Exercise of the powers of the Lead Overseer outside the Union

Article 37

Request for information

Article 38

General investigations

Article 39

Inspections

Article 40

Ongoing oversight

Article 41

Harmonisation of conditions enabling the conduct of the oversight activities

Article 42

Follow-up by competent authorities

Article 43

Oversight fees

Article 44

International cooperation

Chapter VI (Article 45)

Information-sharing arrangements

Article 45

Information-sharing arrangements on cyber threat information and intelligence

Chapter VII (Articles 46 – 56)

Competent authorities

Article 46

Competent authorities

Article 47

Cooperation with structures and authorities established by Directive (EU) 2022/2555

Article 48

Cooperation between authorities

Article 49

Financial cross-sector exercises, communication and cooperation

Article 50

Administrative penalties and remedial measures

Article 51

Exercise of the power to impose administrative penalties and remedial measures

Article 52

Criminal penalties

Article 53

Notification duties

Article 54

Publication of administrative penalties

Article 55

Professional secrecy

Article 56

Data Protection

Chapter VIII (Article 57)

Delegated acts

Article 57

Exercise of the delegation

Chapter IX (Articles 58 – 64)

Transitional and final provisions

Section I

Article 58

Review clause

Section II

Amendments

Article 59

Amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009

Article 60

Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 648/2012

Article 61

Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 909/2014

Article 62

Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 600/2014

Article 63

Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2016/1011

Article 64

Entry into force and application

Recital 80 Importance of collaboration and cooperation

The Oversight Framework largely depends on the degree of collaboration between the Lead Overseermeans the European Supervisory Authority appointed in accordance with Article 31(1), point (b) of this Regulation; and the critical ICT third-party service providermeans an ICT third-party service provider designated as critical in accordance with Article 31; delivering to financial entitiesas defined in Article 2, points (a) to (t) services affecting the supply of financial services. Successful oversight is predicated, inter alia, upon the ability of the Lead Overseermeans the European Supervisory Authority appointed in accordance with Article 31(1), point (b) of this Regulation; to effectively conduct monitoring missions and inspections to assess the rules, controls and processes used by the critical ICT third-party service providersmeans an ICT third-party service provider designated as critical in accordance with Article 31;, as well as to assess the potential cumulative impact of their activities on financial stability and the integrity of the financial system. At the same time, it is crucial that critical ICT third-party service providersmeans an ICT third-party service provider designated as critical in accordance with Article 31; follow the Lead Overseer’s recommendations and address its concerns. Since a lack of cooperation by a critical ICT third-party service providermeans an ICT third-party service provider designated as critical in accordance with Article 31; providing services that affect the supply of financial services, such as the refusal to grant access to its premises or to submit information, would ultimately deprive the Lead Overseermeans the European Supervisory Authority appointed in accordance with Article 31(1), point (b) of this Regulation; of its essential tools in appraising ICT third-party riskmeans an ICT risk that may arise for a financial entity in relation to its use of ICT services provided by ICT third-party service providers or by subcontractors of the latter, including through outsourcing arrangements;, and could adversely impact the financial stability and the integrity of the financial system, it is necessary to also provide for a commensurate sanctioning regime.
Table of contents